Contract Row Pending Story Join
THE MODAL PROPELLANT GAUGING EXPERIMENT SEEKS TO DEMONSTRATE THE INFUSION POTENTIAL OF A NON-INVASIVE INEXPENSIVE AND ROBUST METHOD FOR GAUGING BOTH SETTLED AND UNSETTLED PROPELLANT AT GAUGING RESOLUTIONS OF 1% FOR SETTLED PROPELLANTS AND 2-4% FOR UNSETTLED SLOSHING PROPELLANTS. THE PROPOSED WORK REPRESENTS A SIGNIFICANT EXPANSION OF THE PREVIOUSLY FUNDED PROGRAM OBJECTIVES TO ADDRESS IMMEDIATE NEEDS IN THE ORION/SLS EXPLORATION MISSION ARCHITECTURE. SPECIFICALLY WE ADDRESS TWO CENTRAL OBJECTIVES IN THE PROPOSED WORK. (1) WE INTEND TO DEMONSTRATE 1% ZERO-G GAUGING RESOLUTIONS OF BAFFLE-SETTLED REALISTIC PROPELLANT SIMULANT IN MODEL PROPELLANT TANKS WITH INTERNAL PROPELLANT MANAGEMENT STRUCTURES. (2) WE INTEND TO VERIFY A CENTRAL HYPOTHESIS OF THE MPG APPROACH WHICH IS THAT THE MASS-LOADING OF TANK WALLS (AND THEREFORE THE MODAL FREQUENCIES) IS UNIQUELY DETERMINED BY THE ADHERED LIQUID LAYER. IN ORDER TO MEET THE PROPOSED OBJECTIVES TWO DISTINCT EXPERIMENTS WILL BE CARRIED OUT. THE FIRST OBJECTIVE WILL BE ACCOMPLISHED USING THE MPG PARABOLIC FLIGHT RIG WITH BAFFLE-SETTLED PROPELLANT SIMULANT. WE LL USE ISOPROPYL ALCOHOL (IPA) TO BETTER REPRESENT THE BOND NUMBER AND OTHER LIQUID-STRUCTURE PARAMETERS OF CRYOGENIC PROPELLANTS IN REAL TANKS. THE EXISTING COMPOSITE OVERWRAPPED VESSEL (COPV) TANKS WILL BE OUTFITTED WITH PROPELLANT MANAGEMENT DEVICES AND RING BAFFLES TO ACCURATELY REPRODUCE THE INTERNAL STRUCTURES OF THE ORION PROPELLANT TANKS. THE BAFFLES WILL BE DESIGNED AND TESTED TO PRODUCE SETTLED LIQUIDS WITHIN SECONDS AFTER THE ONSET OF ZERO-G PORTION OF THE PARABOLIC FLIGHT TRAJECTORY. THE TEST PLAN FOR OBJECTIVE 1 IS TO ACQUIRE 24 DATA POINTS AT 1% FILL-FRACTION INTERVALS AT 5 DATA POINTS PER FILL LEVEL (4X PARABOLIC FLIGHTS). THE SECOND OBJECTIVE WILL BE ACCOMPLISHED BY ESTABLISHING A ZERO-G EQUILIBRIUM LIQUID SURFACE AT THREE DIFFERENT FILL FRACTIONS IN SIMPLIFIED MODEL TANKS. WE WILL CORRELATE THE MODAL FREQUENCY SPECTRUM AT EACH FILL FRACTION TO THE ADHERED LIQUID LAYER MASS USING CAMERAS TO VERIFY SURFACE EQUILIBRIUM AND TO MEASURE ADHERED LIQUID MASS FRACTION AND BY USING OUR STANDARD MODAL SENSORS AND COMPUTATIONAL HARDWARE TO MEASURE MODAL RESPONSE. WE HAVE CARRIED OUT COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS (CFD) CALCULATIONS TO DETERMINE THE TANK SIZE AND FILL FRACTION SUCH THAT AN EQUILIBRIUM SURFACE CAN BE OBTAINED WITHIN THE FIRST MINUTE OF THE 2.5 MINUTES OF ZERO-G AFFORDED BY THE BLUE ORIGIN NEW SHEPARD SUBORBITAL VEHICLE. THE REMAINING 1.5 MINUTES WILL BE USED TO ACQUIRE MODAL DATA OF THE THREE TANKS WITH SETTLED LIQUID SURFACES.THE TEST PLAN FOR OBJECTIVE 2 IS TO UTILIZE A DOUBLE-LOCKER PAYLOAD EXPERIMENT ON BLUE ORIGIN S NEW SHEPARD VEHICLE. WE PROPOSE A SINGLE FLIGHT WITH AN EXPERIMENT CONSISTING OF THREE 6-INCH DIAMETER MODEL TANKS AT THREE DIFFERENT FILL FRACTIONS FOR WHICH SETTLED SURFACES CAN BE ACHIEVED IN<1 MINUTE OF CLEAN 0-G. PROPELLANT IS THE PRIMARY LIFE-LIMITING RESOURCE ON SPACECRAFT. ACCURATE GAUGING OF PROPELLANT VOLUME IN A MICROGRAVITY ENVIRONMENT HAS BEEN IDENTIFIED BY THE NASA EXPLORATION SYSTEMS ARCHITECTURE STUDY (ESAS) FINAL REPORT AS AN AREA REQUIRING SIGNIFICANT FURTHER DEVELOPMENT. THE MICROGRAVITY ENVIRONMENT RENDERS DIRECT VOLUME MEASUREMENT USING TRADITIONAL BUOYANCY- AND LEVEL-BASED TECHNIQUES INEFFECTIVE. INSTEAD INDIRECT METHODS ARE CURRENTLY USED TO ESTABLISH PROPELLANT VOLUME. THESE METHODS INCUR CONSIDERABLE ADDITIONAL MASS AND EXPENSE TO MISSION ARCHITECTURES. ADDITIONALLY TRADITIONAL METHODS OF PROPELLANT GAUGING SUFFER FROM DECREASING ACCURACY AS THE TANK EMPTIES SO THAT MASS-GAUGING ACCURACY IS LOWEST AT THE END OF MISSION LIFE WHEN GAUGING ACCURACY IS MOST IMPORTANT. FINALLY PREVIOUS WORK ON MPG HAS ATTRACTED IMMEDIATE INFUSION INTEREST FROM ORION PROGRAM MANAGERS AND THEIR SUPPORT FOR THIS PROPOSAL HAS HELPED SHAPE THE DIRECTION OF THE TECHNOLOGY MATURATION PLAN FOR THIS PROJECT.
THE MODAL PROPELLANT GAUGING EXPERIMENT SEEKS TO DEMONSTRATE THE INFUSION POTENTIAL OF A NON-INVASIVE INEXPENSIVE AND ROBUST METHOD FOR GAUGING BOTH SETTLED AND UNSETTLED PROPELLANT AT GAUGING RESOLUTIONS OF 1% FOR SETTLED PROPELLANTS AND 2-4% FOR UNSETTLED SLOSHING PROPELLANTS. THE PROPOSED WORK REPRESENTS A SIGNIFICANT EXPANSION OF THE PREVIOUSLY FUNDED PROGRAM OBJECTIVES TO ADDRESS IMMEDIATE NEEDS IN THE ORION/SLS EXPLORATION MISSION ARCHITECTURE. SPECIFICALLY WE ADDRESS TWO CENTRAL OBJECTIVES IN THE PROPOSED WORK. (1) WE INTEND TO DEMONSTRATE 1% ZERO-G GAUGING RESOLUTIONS OF BAFFLE-SETTLED REALISTIC PROPELLANT SIMULANT IN MODEL PROPELLANT TANKS WITH INTERNAL PROPELLANT MANAGEMENT STRUCTURES. (2) WE INTEND TO VERIFY A CENTRAL HYPOTHESIS OF THE MPG APPROACH WHICH IS THAT THE MASS-LOADING OF TANK WALLS (AND THEREFORE THE MODAL FREQUENCIES) IS UNIQUELY DETERMINED BY THE ADHERED LIQUID LAYER. IN ORDER TO MEET THE PROPOSED OBJECTIVES TWO DISTINCT EXPERIMENTS WILL BE CARRIED OUT. THE FIRST OBJECTIVE WILL BE ACCOMPLISHED USING THE MPG PARABOLIC FLIGHT RIG WITH BAFFLE-SETTLED PROPELLANT SIMULANT. WE LL USE ISOPROPYL ALCOHOL (IPA) TO BETTER REPRESENT THE BOND NUMBER AND OTHER LIQUID-STRUCTURE PARAMETERS OF CRYOGENIC PROPELLANTS IN REAL TANKS. THE EXISTING COMPOSITE OVERWRAPPED VESSEL (COPV) TANKS WILL BE OUTFITTED WITH PROPELLANT MANAGEMENT DEVICES AND RING BAFFLES TO ACCURATELY REPRODUCE THE INTERNAL STRUCTURES OF THE ORION PROPELLANT TANKS. THE BAFFLES WILL BE DESIGNED AND TESTED TO PRODUCE SETTLED LIQUIDS WITHIN SECONDS AFTER THE ONSET OF ZERO-G PORTION OF THE PARABOLIC FLIGHT TRAJECTORY. THE TEST PLAN FOR OBJECTIVE 1 IS TO ACQUIRE 24 DATA POINTS AT 1% FILL-FRACTION INTERVALS AT 5 DATA POINTS PER FILL LEVEL (4X PARABOLIC FLIGHTS). THE SECOND OBJECTIVE WILL BE ACCOMPLISHED BY ESTABLISHING A ZERO-G EQUILIBRIUM LIQUID SURFACE AT THREE DIFFERENT FILL FRACTIONS IN SIMPLIFIED MODEL TANKS. WE WILL CORRELATE THE MODAL FREQUENCY SPECTRUM AT EACH FILL FRACTION TO THE ADHERED LIQUID LAYER MASS USING CAMERAS TO VERIFY SURFACE EQUILIBRIUM AND TO MEASURE ADHERED LIQUID MASS FRACTION AND BY USING OUR STANDARD MODAL SENSORS AND COMPUTATIONAL HARDWARE TO MEASURE MODAL RESPONSE. WE HAVE CARRIED OUT COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS (CFD) CALCULATIONS TO DETERMINE THE TANK SIZE AND FILL FRACTION SUCH THAT AN EQUILIBRIUM SURFACE CAN BE OBTAINED WITHIN THE FIRST MINUTE OF THE 2.5 MINUTES OF ZERO-G AFFORDED BY THE BLUE ORIGIN NEW SHEPARD SUBORBITAL VEHICLE. THE REMAINING 1.5 MINUTES WILL BE USED TO ACQUIRE MODAL DATA OF THE THREE TANKS WITH SETTLED LIQUID SURFACES.THE TEST PLAN FOR OBJECTIVE 2 IS TO UTILIZE A DOUBLE-LOCKER PAYLOAD EXPERIMENT ON BLUE ORIGIN S NEW SHEPARD VEHICLE. WE PROPOSE A SINGLE FLIGHT WITH AN EXPERIMENT CONSISTING OF THREE 6-INCH DIAMETER MODEL TANKS AT THREE DIFFERENT FILL FRACTIONS FOR WHICH SETTLED SURFACES CAN BE ACHIEVED IN<1 MINUTE OF CLEAN 0-G. PROPELLANT IS THE PRIMARY LIFE-LIMITING RESOURCE ON SPACECRAFT. ACCURATE GAUGING OF PROPELLANT VOLUME IN A MICROGRAVITY ENVIRONMENT HAS BEEN IDENTIFIED BY THE NASA EXPLORATION SYSTEMS ARCHITECTURE STUDY (ESAS) FINAL REPORT AS AN AREA REQUIRING SIGNIFICANT FURTHER DEVELOPMENT. THE MICROGRAVITY ENVIRONMENT RENDERS DIRECT VOLUME MEASUREMENT USING TRADITIONAL BUOYANCY- AND LEVEL-BASED TECHNIQUES INEFFECTIVE. INSTEAD INDIRECT METHODS ARE CURRENTLY USED TO ESTABLISH PROPELLANT VOLUME. THESE METHODS INCUR CONSIDERABLE ADDITIONAL MASS AND EXPENSE TO MISSION ARCHITECTURES. ADDITIONALLY TRADITIONAL METHODS OF PROPELLANT GAUGING SUFFER FROM DECREASING ACCURACY AS THE TANK EMPTIES SO THAT MASS-GAUGING ACCURACY IS LOWEST AT THE END OF MISSION LIFE WHEN GAUGING ACCURACY IS MOST IMPORTANT. FINALLY PREVIOUS WORK ON MPG HAS ATTRACTED IMMEDIATE INFUSION INTEREST FROM ORION PROGRAM MANAGERS AND THEIR SUPPORT FOR THIS PROPOSAL HAS HELPED SHAPE THE DIRECTION OF THE TECHNOLOGY MATURATION PLAN FOR THIS PROJECT.
Discovery Data
- Mission
- Blue Origin Program
- Awarded on
- 2017-12-18
- Obligated amount
- $280,967
- Agency
- NASA
- Customer
- CARTHAGE COLLEGE
- Recipient
- n/a
- Actions
- 1
- Notices
- 0
- Spending points
- 1
- Bidders
- 0
- Exact source records
- 0
Links
Latest Award Actions
Mod 0 • 2017-12-18
Delta: $280,967 • Cumulative: $280,967
Vehicle/Engine Mapping
No vehicle mappings available.
Contract Detail FAQ
Search-first answers for this contract entity and its source identifiers.
- What sources feed the contract data on this site?
- Contract entities combine USAspending award references with SAM.gov-normalized procurement records (including PIID-linked actions, notices, and spending rows when available).
- Why is there a canonical /contracts URL when program pages already exist?
- Program pages keep mission context, while /contracts URLs consolidate duplicate contract entities into one indexable canonical URL so search engines attribute ranking signals to a single record.
- Which identifiers should I search to find a specific government contract?
- Use any of these identifiers: USAspending Award ID, PIID, contract key, solicitation ID, notice ID, recipient/awardee name, or agency/customer name.
- How often do contract pages update?
- Contract pages revalidate on a 10-minute cadence, while upstream source data refresh timing depends on ingest jobs and source-side publication timing.
- What is the difference between SAM.gov and USAspending in these records?
- USAspending primarily provides award and obligation visibility, while SAM.gov captures procurement lifecycle context such as solicitation notices and related action thread signals.
- Why can the contract amount differ from another source?
- Amounts can differ across snapshots because some sources report base award value while others include modification deltas, cumulative obligations, or later adjustments.
- Can one contract appear in more than one program section?
- Yes. A contract may appear in multiple program contexts; canonical entities are designed to consolidate those overlaps into a single URL for indexing and discovery.
- What is a PIID on a contract detail page?
- PIID stands for Procurement Instrument Identifier. It is the contracting identifier used to track related awards, actions, and notices across a procurement thread.
- Where should I verify the official source record for this contract?
- Use the Source record link on the contract detail page. The page also links back to the program-native detail page and, when available, the Artemis story page for thread context.
- Why are actions, notices, or spending rows sometimes missing?
- Missing rows usually mean no matched records were returned yet for that identifier set in the current source snapshot, not that the contract entity itself is invalid.
- What exact terms should I search to verify this specific contract?
- Use these identifiers in search: USASPENDING-80NSSC18K0272 | 80NSSC18K0272. Add terms like "USAspending", "SAM.gov", or the awardee name for faster exact matching.