Skip to main content
T-Minus ZeroComm Link

Exact Contract Story

WE PROPOSE A NOVEL APPROACH TO THE DETECTION OF CHROMOSOMAL INVERSIONS. TRANSMISSIBLE CHROMOSOME ABERRATIONS (TRANSLOCATIONS AND INVERSIONS) HAVE PROFOUND GENETIC EFFECTS, SUCH AS DISRUPTING REGULATORY SEQUENCES THAT CONTROL GENE EXPRESSION, OR CREATING GENETIC CHIMERAS. THESE CHROMOSOME ABERRATIONS PLAY A CAUSATIVE ROLE IN CANCER, AND THEY ARE INDUCED BY RADIATION. AS SUCH, CHROMOSOME ABERRATIONS ARE RELEVANT TO THREE NASA NEEDS, BIODOSIMETRY, ANALYSIS OF ASTRONAUT LYMPHOCYTES FOR CUMULATIVE RADIATION DAMAGE, AND SPACE RADIATION RISK MODELING. OF ALL STRUCTURAL CHROMOSOMAL ANOMALIES, INVERSIONS A REVERSAL OF ORIENTATION OF MATERIAL WITHIN A CHROMOSOME ARE THE MOST DIFFICULT TO DETECT. THIS IS ESPECIALLY TRUE OF SMALL INVERSIONS, MOST OF WHICH ARE INVISIBLE TO ALL CURRENT CYTOGENETIC TECHNIQUES. YET SMALL INVERSIONS ARE LIKELY THE MOST TRANSMISSIBLE (NONLETHAL) FORM OF CHROMOSOMAL DAMAGE, SO THEY PERSIST, A FEATURE WHICH LENDS CREDENCE TO THEIR USE IN RETROSPECTIVE BIODOSIMETRY. THIS PHASE 1 PROJECT IS INTENDED TO PROVIDE A PROOF-OF-PRINCIPLE DEMONSTRATION OF A NEW METHOD OF MOLECULAR CYTOGENETICS THAT WILL PERMIT HIGHLY SENSITIVE INVERSION DETECTION. THE PROJECT WILL HELP US TO PERFECT OUR BIOINFORMATICS STRATEGY FOR PROBE DESIGN, OPTIMIZE PROBE LABELING REACTIONS, REFINE HYBRIDIZATION CONDITIONS, AND ESTABLISH A PROCEDURE FOR COST ANALYSIS. IN PHASE 2, WE WILL SCALE-UP PROBE PRODUCTION TO MAKE WHOLE CHROMOSOME ANALYSIS POSSIBLE. THIS NEXT STEP, ALTHOUGH CONCEPTUALLY SIMPLE, RELIES ENTIRELY ON THE PROCESSES DEVISED AND TESTED IN PHASE 1. MOREOVER EFFICIENT, COST-EFFECTIVE PROBE-MAKING WILL BE ESSENTIAL TO COMMERCIALIZATION (PHASE 3). THE TECHNOLOGY READINESS LEVEL AT THE END OF THE PHASE 1 CONTRACT IS EXPECTED TO BE 4-5, I.E. VALIDATED IN LABORATORY AND RELEVANT ENVIRONMENTS.

WE PROPOSE A NOVEL APPROACH TO THE DETECTION OF CHROMOSOMAL INVERSIONS. TRANSMISSIBLE CHROMOSOME ABERRATIONS (TRANSLOCATIONS AND INVERSIONS) HAVE PROFOUND GENETIC EFFECTS, SUCH AS DISRUPTING REGULATORY SEQUENCES THAT CONTROL GENE EXPRESSION, OR CREATING GENETIC CHIMERAS. THESE CHROMOSOME ABERRATIONS PLAY A CAUSATIVE ROLE IN CANCER, AND THEY ARE INDUCED BY RADIATION. AS SUCH, CHROMOSOME ABERRATIONS ARE RELEVANT TO THREE NASA NEEDS, BIODOSIMETRY, ANALYSIS OF ASTRONAUT LYMPHOCYTES FOR CUMULATIVE RADIATION DAMAGE, AND SPACE RADIATION RISK MODELING. OF ALL STRUCTURAL CHROMOSOMAL ANOMALIES, INVERSIONS A REVERSAL OF ORIENTATION OF MATERIAL WITHIN A CHROMOSOME ARE THE MOST DIFFICULT TO DETECT. THIS IS ESPECIALLY TRUE OF SMALL INVERSIONS, MOST OF WHICH ARE INVISIBLE TO ALL CURRENT CYTOGENETIC TECHNIQUES. YET SMALL INVERSIONS ARE LIKELY THE MOST TRANSMISSIBLE (NONLETHAL) FORM OF CHROMOSOMAL DAMAGE, SO THEY PERSIST, A FEATURE WHICH LENDS CREDENCE TO THEIR USE IN RETROSPECTIVE BIODOSIMETRY. THIS PHASE 1 PROJECT IS INTENDED TO PROVIDE A PROOF-OF-PRINCIPLE DEMONSTRATION OF A NEW METHOD OF MOLECULAR CYTOGENETICS THAT WILL PERMIT HIGHLY SENSITIVE INVERSION DETECTION. THE PROJECT WILL HELP US TO PERFECT OUR BIOINFORMATICS STRATEGY FOR PROBE DESIGN, OPTIMIZE PROBE LABELING REACTIONS, REFINE HYBRIDIZATION CONDITIONS, AND ESTABLISH A PROCEDURE FOR COST ANALYSIS. IN PHASE 2, WE WILL SCALE-UP PROBE PRODUCTION TO MAKE WHOLE CHROMOSOME ANALYSIS POSSIBLE. THIS NEXT STEP, ALTHOUGH CONCEPTUALLY SIMPLE, RELIES ENTIRELY ON THE PROCESSES DEVISED AND TESTED IN PHASE 1. MOREOVER EFFICIENT, COST-EFFECTIVE PROBE-MAKING WILL BE ESSENTIAL TO COMMERCIALIZATION (PHASE 3). THE TECHNOLOGY READINESS LEVEL AT THE END OF THE PHASE 1 CONTRACT IS EXPECTED TO BE 4-5, I.E. VALIDATED IN LABORATORY AND RELEVANT ENVIRONMENTS.

Status: Exact storyScope: blue-originContract key: USASPENDING-NNX09CE42PAward ID: NNX09CE42P

Discovery Data

Mission
Blue Origin Program
Awarded on
2009-01-22
Obligated amount
$99,998
Agency
NASA
Customer
KROMATID, INC.
Recipient
KROMATID, INC.
Actions
1
Notices
0
Spending points
1
Bidders
0
Exact source records
1

Links

Exact Source Evidence

Exact external records already attached to this contract story.

USASpending award

1 linked

Latest Award Actions

  • Mod 02009-01-22

    Delta: $99,998 • Cumulative: $99,998

Vehicle/Engine Mapping

No vehicle mappings available.

Contract Detail FAQ

Search-first answers for this contract entity and its source identifiers.

What sources feed the contract data on this site?
Contract entities combine USAspending award references with SAM.gov-normalized procurement records (including PIID-linked actions, notices, and spending rows when available).
Why is there a canonical /contracts URL when program pages already exist?
Program pages keep mission context, while /contracts URLs consolidate duplicate contract entities into one indexable canonical URL so search engines attribute ranking signals to a single record.
Which identifiers should I search to find a specific government contract?
Use any of these identifiers: USAspending Award ID, PIID, contract key, solicitation ID, notice ID, recipient/awardee name, or agency/customer name.
How often do contract pages update?
Contract pages revalidate on a 10-minute cadence, while upstream source data refresh timing depends on ingest jobs and source-side publication timing.
What is the difference between SAM.gov and USAspending in these records?
USAspending primarily provides award and obligation visibility, while SAM.gov captures procurement lifecycle context such as solicitation notices and related action thread signals.
Why can the contract amount differ from another source?
Amounts can differ across snapshots because some sources report base award value while others include modification deltas, cumulative obligations, or later adjustments.
Can one contract appear in more than one program section?
Yes. A contract may appear in multiple program contexts; canonical entities are designed to consolidate those overlaps into a single URL for indexing and discovery.
What is a PIID on a contract detail page?
PIID stands for Procurement Instrument Identifier. It is the contracting identifier used to track related awards, actions, and notices across a procurement thread.
Where should I verify the official source record for this contract?
Use the Source record link on the contract detail page. The page also links back to the program-native detail page and, when available, the Artemis story page for thread context.
Why are actions, notices, or spending rows sometimes missing?
Missing rows usually mean no matched records were returned yet for that identifier set in the current source snapshot, not that the contract entity itself is invalid.
What exact terms should I search to verify this specific contract?
Use these identifiers in search: USASPENDING-NNX09CE42P | NNX09CE42P. Add terms like "USAspending", "SAM.gov", or the awardee name for faster exact matching.